# Quantum photonic interconnects for datacenter switching Market Research Report - Global

**Generated on:** 2026-10-19 10:09:04.278588  
**Industry:** Quantum photonic interconnects for datacenter switching  
**Geography:** Global  
**Details:** AUTHORIZED SECURITY ASSESSMENT 2026-10-19 (lane L7) - record 2 of 2, rate-limit concurrency control. Safe to delete.

---

# Quantum Photonic Switching: Where Infrastructure Investment Pays Off

## Executive Summary

**Global market assessment | 19 October 2026**

- **Separate Quantum From Optical**: NVIDIA's Quantum-X Photonics is classical InfiniBand equipment, while Cisco's Universal Quantum Switch is a quantum-information research prototype. Similar branding conceals different customers, performance measures and commercialization paths -> maintain separate market models. [35][10]
- **Invest In Bottlenecks, Not A Headline TAM**: McKinsey forecasts a broader quantum-communication market of **$11B-$15B by 2035**, but this is not a quantum datacenter-switching forecast -> size opportunities from processor installations, networking attachment and qualified system content. [8]
- **Readiness Is Uneven Across The Stack**: Cisco reports nanosecond switching, but its experimentally validated encoding is polarization; time-bin and frequency-bin validation remains ahead -> evaluate demonstrated interfaces rather than the breadth of the architecture's ambition. [10]
- **Link Quality Is Not Computing Throughput**: Oxford demonstrates remote quantum gates with **86.2(9)% average fidelity**, while PsiQuantum reports **99.72% +/- 0.04%** chip-to-chip fidelity conditional on photon arrival. These measure different operations -> require application-level benchmarks before comparing suppliers. [5][13]
- **Field Deployment Exposes The Rate Gap**: Qunnect and Cisco report **5,400 swapped pairs/hour across 17.6 km** of deployed fiber, versus more than **1.7M/hour locally** -> underwrite deployed-network performance, not laboratory source rates. [19]
- **Funding Is Financing, Not Demand**: Nu Quantum's **$60M Series A** and its **GBP2.3M prototype contract** demonstrate investor commitment and funded development, not equivalent product revenue -> distinguish equity capital, development awards and repeatable sales. [39][38]
- **Security And Computing Have Different Business Cases**: EuroQCI advances QKD infrastructure, whereas the NSA's June 2026 guidance does not recommend QKD for National Security Systems unless limitations are overcome -> separate security procurement from processor-interconnect economics. [20][17]
- **Control Software Is Becoming A Distinct Layer**: Cisco introduces controller and compiler research prototypes in October 2026, and Aliro demonstrates software on ABQ-Net -> assess orchestration and integration alongside photonic hardware, without assuming a mature multivendor standard. [15][24]

**Bottom line:** The strongest evidence supports a specialized, pilot-led infrastructure opportunity. It does not yet support treating quantum photonic switching as a broadly deployed replacement for conventional datacenter networking.

## 1. Entanglement, Not Branding, Defines The Market

The relevant market comprises photonic links and switching that distribute quantum states or entanglement between quantum processors, together with the interfaces, memories and control systems needed to make those links useful. Cisco's architecture separates physical hardware, entanglement management and distributed computing; the academic Quantum Data Centre model similarly connects colocated quantum processors through a quantum local area network. [1][11]

This is a hybrid infrastructure market, not a replacement for Ethernet or InfiniBand. RFC 9340 describes quantum and classical networks working together: entangled pairs form the quantum resource, while classical channels carry essential coordination information. Unlike classical packets, qubits do not carry routing headers. [6]

| Segment | What Moves Across The Network | Relevant Offering | Treatment In This Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum processor interconnects | Quantum states or entanglement | Cisco quantum switch; Nu Quantum QNUs | Core market. [10][7] |
| Quantum interface and memory infrastructure | Quantum information converted, stored or synchronized between subsystems | QphoX transducers; Welinq links and memories | Enabling content, with care to avoid double-counting integrated systems. [25][23] |
| Quantum communications security | Cryptographic key distribution | EuroQCI; Singapore NQSN+ | Adjacent demand, not a direct measure of processor-switching sales. [20][34] |
| Classical photonic AI networking | Classical data encoded on light | NVIDIA Quantum-X/Spectrum-X; Ayar Labs CPO | Excluded from the quantum switching TAM. [35][14] |

The investment implication is straightforward: a shared optical manufacturing base does not create a shared addressable market.

### NVIDIA And Cisco Illustrate The Category Boundary

NVIDIA's Quantum-X InfiniBand Photonics offering includes a **144-port, 800 Gb/s** switch. Despite its name, the product serves classical InfiniBand networks; its silicon photonics improve data movement between conventional computing systems. Ayar Labs likewise describes CPO connecting GPU clusters across racks. [35][14]

Cisco's April 2026 announcement addresses a different problem: preserving quantum information while connecting quantum systems. Its Universal Quantum Switch is a **research prototype**, with polarization experimentally validated and other encoding capabilities at different stages of validation. [10] Consequently, classical bandwidth, port density and energy-per-bit claims cannot establish a quantum switch's useful entanglement rate or remote-computing performance.

**Decision-ready insight:** Maintain two opportunity maps: classical optical AI networking for conventional compute infrastructure, and quantum interconnects for quantum processor ecosystems. The latter requires qubit-specific qualification, not merely datacenter compatibility.

## 2. Market Economics: Context Is Larger Than The Addressable Segment

**A defensible standalone global revenue estimate for quantum photonic datacenter switching is not established by the cited market forecasts.** The available figures describe broader quantum computing, communication or photonic-component markets. Their different definitions make aggregation misleading.

| Market Indicator | Reported Value | Interpretation For Quantum Switching |
|---|---:|---|
| McKinsey quantum-communication market size | **$1.3B-$1.6B in 2025; $3.5B-$4.6B in 2030; $11B-$15B in 2035** | Broad context, including communication applications such as QKD; not switch revenue. [8] |
| QED-C quantum-computing market | **$1.4B in 2025; projected $3B by 2028** | Upstream customer-sector scale, not networking equipment expenditure. [32] |
| McKinsey quantum-computing company revenue | **More than $1B in 2025; estimated $3.2B-$4.4B in 2028** | Another indicator of upstream commercialization; its coverage differs from QED-C's. [8] |
| IDTechEx silicon-photonics/PIC market for datacom and quantum applications | **$50B by 2036; 21.9% CAGR** | Predominantly optical transceivers; quantum applications emerge as a smaller contributor. [9] |

These forecasts support the direction of ecosystem expansion, not a precise quantum-switching TAM. McKinsey explicitly bases its market projections on development roadmaps and assumed technology-adoption curves; its communication figures are labeled market size rather than a separately disclosed company-revenue series. [8]

### Nu Quantum Shows Why Capital And Revenue Must Be Separated

Nu Quantum closes a **$60M Series A on 10 December 2025**, led by National Grid Partners. The company positions its Entanglement Fabric as an interoperable layer for linking processors and reports networking subsystem development, including a Qubit-Photon Interface and Quantum Networking Unit. [39]

Separately, Nu Quantum describes a **GBP2.3M contract awarded in 2023** under the UK Government's SBRI competition to deliver a modular, rack-mount quantum datacenter prototype, with Cisco as prospective end-user. Its first-generation QNU is initially designed for trapped-ion qubits. [38] The contrast matters: venture funding finances development, while a prototype award funds a defined technical deliverable. Neither establishes recurring sales at commercial fleet scale.

The case suggests that early demand should be modeled around funded processor programs, development contracts and testbeds, rather than the total number of conventional datacenters. This is an investment inference, not a published market forecast.

A practical bottom-up model is:

**Annual opportunity = qualifying processor installations x external-networking attachment x realized networking content, plus separately purchased switching, control and service revenue.**

Use alternative scenarios for processor adoption, interface qualification and customer acceptance. Exclude internally supplied content from merchant opportunity, and avoid counting a memory or transducer both as a component sale and again inside a full-system sale. No numerical scenario is warranted without credible installation volumes and realized prices.

**Decision-ready insight:** Fund customer-linked qualification milestones. Treat broad quantum forecasts as context and financing announcements as runway indicators, not proof of product-market fit.

## 3. Demonstrations Reveal Which Performance Metrics Matter

The technical evidence is progressing, but reported metrics describe different layers. Quantum-state preservation, entanglement generation, remote gate fidelity and algorithm success are not interchangeable.

| Demonstration | Measured Result | Commercial Interpretation And Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Universal Quantum Switch, April 2026 | **<=4% average degradation** in tested fidelity/entanglement measures; reconfiguration as little as **1 ns**; switch power **<1 W** | Research prototype tested with Cisco's source and single-photon detectors. These are not complete-network power or application-throughput figures. [10] |
| Oxford distributed quantum computing, 2025 | Two modules about **2 m** apart; remote CZ-gate average fidelity **86.2(9)%**; entanglement generation **9.7/s** | Demonstrates useful distributed operations, but not a large switched production network. [5] |
| PsiQuantum photonic platform, 2025 | **42 m** chip-to-chip fiber link; fidelity **99.72% +/- 0.04%**, conditional on photon arrival | Strong state-quality result, but photon delivery probability remains economically important; coupling introduces approximately **3 dB** loss. [13] |
| Qunnect/Cisco New York field demonstration, February 2026 | **17.6 km** deployed fiber; **5,400 swapped pairs/hour**, equivalent to **1.5/s** by calculation | Field operation is demonstrated. Reported **>99% polarization fidelity** must not be relabeled remote-gate or logical-computing fidelity. [19] |

The takeaway is not that one supplier is faster or better. The experiments differ in topology, operation, loss, conditioning and fidelity definition.

### Oxford Demonstrates Computing, Not Just A Photonic Connection

Oxford's experiment uses separate network and circuit qubits in two trapped-ion modules. Heralded entanglement supports teleportation of a controlled-Z gate between the modules, achieving **86.2(9)% average gate fidelity**. The optical link itself produces Bell pairs with **96.89(8)% fidelity** at an average rate of **9.7/s**. [5]

This distinction is commercially important. A high-quality entangled resource still has to survive local operations, measurement and feed-forward before becoming a useful distributed computation. The experiment also implements Grover's algorithm with **71(1)% average success probability**, moving the evidence beyond transmission alone while remaining a small-scale demonstration. [5] Buyers should therefore evaluate completed remote operations, not just source or link quality.

### PsiQuantum Shows Both Manufacturing Progress And Loss Sensitivity

PsiQuantum's platform uses a commercial-foundry **300-mm silicon-photonics process**, with demonstrated on-chip operations and chip-to-chip networking. Its fiber experiment converts path encoding to polarization and back, showing how packaging and encoding interfaces become part of a quantum link. [13]

However, the excellent chip-to-chip fidelity is conditional on photon arrival. The paper also reports approximately **3 dB coupling loss**, while demonstrated thermal reconfiguration differs from the intended next-generation electro-optic switching approach. [13] The commercial lesson is that manufacturing compatibility is necessary but does not remove delivery-loss, packaging or switching constraints.

**Decision-ready insight:** Require simultaneous reporting of usable entanglement rate at a target fidelity, loss budget, remote-operation performance, duty cycle and full-system operating burden. A conditional fidelity or isolated switching-speed result is insufficient for procurement.

## 4. Competition Organizes Around Interfaces, Memory And Control

The landscape includes networking specialists, component suppliers and processor companies that integrate networking internally. These groups can collaborate at one layer while competing at another.

| Player | Relevant Layer Or Offering | Evidence-Based Position |
|---|---|---|
| **Cisco** | Universal Quantum Switch; network controller; network-aware compiler | Hardware and October 2026 software are research prototypes, not evidence of a mature production fabric. [10][15] |
| **Nu Quantum** | Qubit-Photon Interfaces, optical switching/detection and rack-mount QNUs | Processor-adaptable networking architecture and prototype integration. [7] |
| **Qunnect** | Carina entanglement sources and stabilization; deployed-fiber networks | Field demonstrations and publicly described testbed contracts. [24] |
| **QphoX** | Microwave-optical quantum transduction; separate optical control products | Addresses superconducting-system interfaces; product descriptions alone do not establish end-to-end network performance. [25] |
| **Welinq** | Quantum Link, QDrive storage and distributed-computing software | Full-stack networking offering, including neutral-atom quantum memories and processor partnerships. [18][23] |
| **IonQ, including Lightsynq** | Photonic interconnects, quantum memory and repeaters | Lightsynq acquisition completed in June 2025; assess within IonQ, not as a separate independent competitor. [22] |
| **Photonic Inc.** | T-centre silicon-spin architecture with telecom photonic interfaces | Switched optical approach spanning on-chip and intermodule networking; TELUS provides fiber access for testing. [4] |
| **PsiQuantum and Quandela** | Photonic processor platforms and associated interconnect requirements | PsiQuantum demonstrates chip networking; Quandela partners with Welinq on custom links. Neither case establishes a general-purpose merchant switch business. [13][31] |
| **Aliro** | Simulation, deployment and operation software | Demonstrates its AlirOS KeyGen stack on ABQ-Net, illustrating a software layer above network hardware. [24] |

The strategic divide is between supplying an open processor ecosystem and capturing networking value inside a vertically integrated computing platform. Public evidence does not support a reliable market-share ranking across these different business models.

### Welinq And QphoX Address Complementary Bottlenecks

The February 2025 Welinq-QphoX partnership targets optical interconnects for superconducting processors. QphoX supplies the microwave/optical interface concept, while Welinq combines laser-cooled neutral-atom memories, photonic links and its araQne compiler. [23]

The mechanism is complementarity: conversion connects otherwise incompatible frequency domains, while storage helps coordinate probabilistic quantum events. The announced outcome is a joint development effort, not a completed, benchmarked processor cluster; the announcement supplies no numerical end-to-end conversion efficiency, fidelity or rate. [23] Investment decisions should therefore depend on joint system performance, not the quality of either subsystem in isolation.

### IonQ Chooses Integration Rather Than A Merchant Interface Alone

IonQ completes its acquisition of Lightsynq on **3 June 2025**, adding photonic interconnect and quantum-memory capabilities. The company explicitly connects these technologies to its modular computing and networking roadmap. [22]

The completed acquisition is the commercial outcome; the roadmap acceleration remains prospective. This creates a different competitive logic from an independent networking vendor: integrated design may improve coordination, but the addressable external component market can shrink when processor suppliers internalize the same functions. That trade-off is an analytical implication, not a claim about current market shares.

**Decision-ready insight:** Favor suppliers with qualified processor interfaces, system-level evidence and clear ownership of the customer relationship. Map acquisition exposure and internal supply before estimating merchant revenue.

## 5. Global Routes To Market Start With Specific Ecosystems

Geographic opportunity depends more on processor programs, telecom access and public procurement than on conventional datacenter capacity alone. Evidence also differs fundamentally between entanglement networking and quantum-safe communications.

| Ecosystem | Concrete Evidence | Route-To-Market Implication |
|---|---|---|
| **United States** | Qunnect/Cisco New York field demonstration; ABQ-Net contract and participating companies. [19][24] | Testbeds provide practical integration and customer-discovery environments. |
| **Canada** | Photonic's telecom-linked architecture and TELUS fiber access for testing. [4] | Processor-telecom collaboration offers a focused development route. |
| **United Kingdom** | Nu Quantum's funded prototype and processor-interface development. [38][26] | Target development contracts and processor partnerships rather than generic colocation sales. |
| **European Union** | QIA-Phase1 funds an entanglement-network prototype; EuroQCI advances QKD infrastructure. [21][20] | Separate computing/network research budgets from secure-communication deployment budgets. |
| **China** | Three atomic-memory nodes, maximally separated by **12.5 km**, connect through a photonic server. [29] | Strong research evidence, but not a disclosed merchant datacenter-switch deployment. |
| **Japan** | NICT reports experimental entanglement swapping using sum-frequency generation between single photons. [37] | Track advanced photonic operations without treating laboratory results as a commercial switching fleet. |
| **Singapore** | SPTel and SpeQtral's NQSN+ appointment addresses nationwide quantum-safe networking using QKD. [34] | Relevant to communications security, not direct evidence of processor-interconnect demand. |

The regional pattern supports partnership-led market entry. A country's investment in quantum security does not automatically establish demand for distributed-computing switches.

### Europe Exposes Two Different Procurement Pathways

QIA-Phase1 has an **EUR24M EU contribution** and describes a full-stack prototype operating over standard optical fibers. Its objective includes connecting two metropolitan networks through a backbone exceeding **500 km**, using quantum repeaters and hubs. These are project objectives, not proof that the completed topology is operational. [21]

EuroQCI follows a different pathway. Its first terrestrial implementation phase runs from **2023 to 2025**, and the program describes initial steps toward operational QKD, supported by testing and evaluation infrastructure. [20] Both programs can support photonic suppliers, but their acceptance criteria differ: entanglement-network capability in one case, cryptographic key services in the other.

### ABQ-Net Shows How Test Infrastructure Can Become A Product

Qunnect describes creating ABQ-Net through a contract with Roadrunner Venture Studios, giving participants access to live quantum testing environments without building their own specialized infrastructure. Its July 2026 announcement identifies Aliro's software demonstration alongside other participating companies. [24]

The important commercial result is the provision of a testing environment and integration venue. It should not be mistaken for proof of broad enterprise demand for fault-tolerant distributed computing. For an entrant, however, such infrastructure can reduce the cost of proving compatibility and expose the company to processor, software and public-sector partners.

**Decision-ready insight:** Choose geography through a named customer or development ecosystem. Distinguish research awards, infrastructure contracts, security services and repeatable equipment sales in the pipeline.

## 6. Commercialization Risks Extend Beyond Photonic Switching Speed

The **no-cloning theorem** prevents copying an arbitrary unknown quantum state, so quantum networks cannot rely on conventional signal amplification and retransmission. Entanglement swapping, memory management and classical coordination become architectural necessities rather than optional network features. [6]

| Risk | Mechanism And Evidence | Commercial Response |
|---|---|---|
| **Loss And Misleading Fidelity** | A high conditional state fidelity does not include the probability of photon delivery; PsiQuantum separately reports coupling loss. [13] | Contract for accepted operations at target fidelity, with a complete loss budget. |
| **Transduction Qualification** | Microwave-optical conversion bridges a large frequency mismatch, and preserving quantum information remains a central challenge. [11] | Require end-to-end efficiency, noise and processor-compatible tests. |
| **System-Level Cooling Burden** | Room-temperature endpoints do not make an entire network room-temperature; the Qunnect/Cisco trial concentrates cryogenic equipment at the hub. [19] | Price detectors, cooling, maintenance and site integration together. |
| **Interoperability And Lock-In** | Cisco's broad encoding design exceeds the subset experimentally validated in its announcement. [10] | Specify tested interfaces, upgrade paths and multivendor acceptance conditions. |
| **Standards Immaturity** | RFC 9340 is Informational, not an Internet Standards Track specification; QIRG is a research group rather than a standards body. [6][2] | Avoid equating architectural alignment with certified interoperability. |
| **Security-Market Substitution** | NSA identifies authentication, implementation, trusted-relay and denial-of-service limitations in QKD. [17] | Compare security proposals with post-quantum cryptography, separately from computing links. |

The risk stack favors milestone-based purchasing: device success does not automatically resolve integration, operating cost or customer-value risk.

### The New York Trial Shows Why Network Conditions Matter

Qunnect and Cisco's trial reports more than **1.7M swapped pairs/hour locally**, but **5,400/hour over deployed fiber**. It also uses independent entanglement sources without shared lasers, supporting a modular architecture, while concentrating cryogenic equipment at the central hub. [19]

The deployment is a meaningful advance, but its economics depend on performance under the actual fiber, stabilization and detector conditions. A buyer should not substitute the local rate for the deployed rate or interpret polarization fidelity as application-level gate fidelity. The relevant acceptance test is useful service at the chosen endpoint, not the fastest number from any subsystem.

### NSA Guidance Challenges The Simplest Security Pitch

As of June 2026, the NSA does not recommend QKD for National Security Systems unless technical limitations are overcome. It notes that QKD does not authenticate the source, needs specialized infrastructure and can introduce implementation and denial-of-service vulnerabilities. [17]

That position limits an uncomplicated claim that quantum networking is automatically the best security investment. It does **not** eliminate the separate case for networking quantum processors: post-quantum cryptography protects classical communications but does not distribute entanglement between processors. The latter distinction follows from the different services described by the NSA and RFC 9340. [17][6]

**Decision-ready insight:** Separate security value from computing value. Underwrite system-level rate, fidelity, availability and operating burden before scaling an equipment commitment.

## 7. Synthesis: Different Architectures Require Different Investment Tests

The market is not converging on one interchangeable product category. It is developing several approaches with different mechanisms, customers, evidence bases and trade-offs.

| Strategy And Representative Players | Mechanism And Scope | Evidence Base | Principal Trade-Off | Recommended Investment Stance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Networking fabrics: Cisco, Nu Quantum, Qunnect; Aliro software** | Distribute and orchestrate entanglement across processor or network endpoints | Research switches/controllers, processor-interface prototypes and field/testbed integration. [10][7][19][24] | Broad interoperability ambition increases qualification and integration work | Pilot-led; release capital against accepted multivendor operation |
| **Interface/memory specialists: QphoX, Welinq** | Convert and coordinate quantum information between processor and photonic domains | Product offerings and joint development partnerships. [25][23] | Component advantage may not survive full-system efficiency/noise constraints | Milestone-dependent; seek joint processor demonstrations |
| **Integrated processors: IonQ/Lightsynq, Photonic, PsiQuantum, Quandela** | Co-design networking with the computing architecture | Acquisition, architecture-specific links and peer-reviewed component/network results. [22][4][13][31] | Tighter optimization can reduce merchant openness and increase platform dependence | Evaluate against the complete computing roadmap |
| **Classical CPO: NVIDIA, Ayar Labs** | Move classical AI data optically | Classical GPU networking products and CPO architectures. [35][14] | Shares photonic capabilities but not the quantum service or addressable demand | Maintain a separate, non-quantum investment case |

The non-obvious tension is that the largest interoperability promise is not necessarily the shortest route to revenue. A tightly integrated processor architecture can qualify a narrower interface, while an open fabric must accommodate differences in encoding, timing, memory and processor behavior. Cisco's validation boundary and Welinq-QphoX's joint development illustrate that trade-off. [10][23]

### Cisco's October Software Prototypes Make Control A Strategic Layer

On **6 October 2026**, Cisco introduces the Quantum Network Controller and an updated Network-Aware Quantum Compiler as research prototypes. The compiler is offered through a free 30-day trial, rather than being evidence of a fully commercial hardware fabric. [15]

This development changes the evaluation boundary. A switch can preserve a quantum state yet still require software to coordinate entanglement resources and map an algorithm onto network constraints. RFC 9340's separation of quantum resources and classical control explains why hardware and orchestration must be evaluated together. [6] Software accessibility can enable experimentation before the underlying infrastructure reaches production maturity; it should not be used as a proxy for that maturity.

For buyers, the first gate is a demonstrated match to the intended processor, encoding and topology. The next is accepted performance under real network conditions, including failure recovery and full operating requirements. Expansion should follow only when the combined hardware and software deliver the required remote operation or application outcome.

For investors, three outcomes deserve different treatment: repeatable third-party networking sales; strategic integration into a processor platform; and continued dependence on development funding. Nu Quantum's prototype contract, IonQ's acquisition and the field-test infrastructure around Qunnect show that these are distinct commercialization paths, not stages that every company necessarily follows. [38][22][24]

**Final recommendation:** Pursue selective exposure to qualified interfaces, quantum memory, low-loss integration and orchestration. Prefer customer-linked milestones over broad quantum-market growth assumptions, and keep classical photonic networking and quantum-security procurement outside the core switching revenue model.

## References

1. *Outshift | Building the fabric of quantum networking: Inside Cisco's Quantum Data Center vision*. https://outshift.cisco.com/blog/quantum/cisco-quantum-data-center-vision
2. *Quantum Technologies (RP 2026) | Interoperable Europe Portal*. https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/rolling-plan-ict-standardisation/quantum-technologies-rp-2026
3. *Quantum Networking: Experiments, Simulation, and Standards for Scalable Infrastructure | NIST*. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/external-events/quantum-networking-experiments-simulation-and-standards-scalable
4. *Quantum Networking and Connectivity | Photonic Inc.*. https://photonic.com/technology/networking/
5. *Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link | Nature*. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08404-x
6. [
            
        RFC 9340 - Architectural Principles for a Quantum Internet

        ](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9340/)
7. *Nu Quantum*. https://www.nu-quantum.com/technology
8. *Quantum Technology  Monitor*. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/technology/our%20insights/mckinsey%20quantum%20technology%20monitor%202026%20a%20commercial%20tipping%20point/quantum-technology-monitor-2026.pdf
9. *Silicon Photonics and Photonic Integrated Circuits 2026-2036: Technologies, Markets, and Forecasts: IDTechEx*. https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/silicon-photonics-and-photonic-integrated-circuits/1151
10. *Cisco Introduces Universal Quantum Switch, Advancing the Path to a Quantum Network*. https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2026/m04/cisco-introduces-universal-quantum-switch-advancing-the-path-to-a-quantum-network.html
11. *Quantum Data Centres: why entanglement changes everything | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | The Royal Society*. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article/384/2315/20240518/480526/Quantum-Data-Centres-why-entanglement-changes
12. *Ayar Labs | Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) | Data Movement for AI*. https://ayarlabs.com/blog/co-packaged-optics-step-into-the-spotlight/
13. *A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing*. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08820-7.pdf?code=d0da5b5e-107a-41ac-843d-06f69f590ba0&error=cookies_not_supported
14. *Ayar Labs | Co-Packaged Optics for Hyperscale AI*. https://ayarlabs.com/
15. *Quantum Networking Gets a Control Plane - Cisco Blogs*. https://blogs.cisco.com/news/quantum-networking-gets-a-control-plane
16. [
	National Security Agency/Central Security Service > Cybersecurity > Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Quantum Cryptography QC
](https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/Quantum-Key-Distribution-QKD-and-Quantum-Cryptography-QC)
17. [
	Quantum Cryptographic Solutions are Limited Compared to Post-Quantum Algorithms > National Security Agency/Central Security Service > Post-Quantum Cryptography Resource Article Display
](https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/Post-Quantum-Cryptography-Resource-Hub/Article-Display/Article/4616320/quantum-cryptographic-solutions-are-limited-compared-to-post-quantum-algorithms)
18. *Welinq | Provides quantum links*. https://www.welinq.fr/
19. *Qunnect | Press Release - Qunnect and Cisco Demonstrate First Metro-Scale, High-Speed Quantum Entanglement Swapping Over Commercial Fiber*. https://www.qunnect.inc/press-releases/2026-02-18
20. *European Quantum Communication Infrastructure - EuroQCI | Shaping Europe’s digital future*. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-quantum-communication-infrastructure-euroqci
21. *Quantum Internet Alliance - Phase1 | QIA-Phase1 | Project | Fact Sheet | HORIZON | CORDIS | European Commission*. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101102140
22. *IonQ | IonQ Completes Acquisition of Lightsynq, Accelerating Quantum Computing and Networking Roadmap*. https://www.ionq.com/news/ionq-completes-acquisition-of-lightsynq-accelerating-quantum-computing-and
23. *Welinq | Welinq and QphoX Partner to Create Seamless Connections Between Superconducting Quantum Processors for Scalable Computing*. https://www.welinq.fr/blog/welinq-and-qphox-partner-to-create-seamless-connections-between-superconducting-quantum-processors-for-scalable-computing
24. *Qunnect | Press Release - Four Leading Quantum Companies Sign-on to ABQ-Net, the First Open-Access Quantum Network in the United States*. https://www.qunnect.inc/press-releases/2026-07-28
25. *Home - QphoX*. https://qphox.eu/
26. *Nu Quantum*. https://www.nu-quantum.com/news/nu-quantum-opens-state-of-the-art-trapped-ion-qubit-networking-lab-in-cambridge-to-accelerate-distributed-quantum-computing
27. *ROADMAP 2026–2033*. https://www.quandela.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Roadmap-brochure-220426-web.pdf
28. *Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network | Nature*. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07308-0.pdf
29. *Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network | Nature*. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07308-0
30. *ROADMAP 2026–2033*. https://www.quandela.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Quandela-Roadmap-190326-web.pdf
31. *Quandela and Welinq Join Forces to Create Custom Quantum Interconnects for Photonic Quantum Computing*. https://www.quandela.com/about-us/newsroom/quandela-and-welinq-join-forces-to-create-custom-quantum-interconnects-for-photonic-quantum-computing/
32. [
    QED-C | Global Quantum Computing Market to Double by 2028, Reaching $3 Billion in Revenue, QED-C® State of the Global Quantum Industry 2026 Report Finds | QED-C  ](https://quantumconsortium.org/global-quantum-computing-market-to-double/)
33. *The National Quantum-Safe Network in Singapore*. https://www.ece.nus.edu.sg/stfpage/bsikdar/papers/ecoc_23.pdf
34. *Speqtral | SpeQtral and SPTel appointed to build NQSN+,  Singapore’s…*. https://speqtralquantum.com/newsroom/speqtral-and-sptel-appointed-to-build-nqsn-singapores-first-nationwide-quantum-safe-network
35. *Silicon Photonics Networking for Agentic AI | NVIDIA*. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/networking/products/silicon-photonics
36. [
	NVIDIA Corporation - NVIDIA Announces Spectrum-X Photonics, Co-Packaged Optics Networking Switches to Scale AI Factories to Millions of GPUs
](https://investor.nvidia.com/news/press-release-details/2025/NVIDIA-Announces-Spectrum-X-Photonics-Co-Packaged-Optics-Networking-Switches-to-Scale-AI-Factories-to-Millions-of-GPUs/)
37. *5*. https://www.nict.go.jp/en/data/nict-news/NICT_NEWS_2026-519_E.pdf
38. *Nu Quantum*. https://www.nu-quantum.com/news/a-world-first-prototype-for-distributed-quantum-network-control
39. *Nu Quantum*. https://www.nu-quantum.com/news/nu-quantum-raises-60m-series-a-in-largest-financing-round-for-quantum-computer-networking
40. *Nu Quantum*. https://www.nu-quantum.com/news/nu-quantum-cisco-partner-to-develop-groundbreaking-modular-quantum-network-prototype-with-2-3-million-(-2-9m-usd)-in-uk-government-funding